Hay quienes se han preguntado si la "estrella" que indicaba el nacimiento de Jesucristo, era un cometa u otrta cosa. Si era un cometa, no hubo referencias entre otros estudiosos. Si era un cometa, debió ser muy cercano al suelo (no lo vió ningún otro "curioso"). En cambio, si era un platillo volador (OVNI), la cosa era más exclusiva de los pastores judíos, puesto que es un evento más local, si no subjetivo, pero -en el caso de la cruz- ¿por qué no investigar en los registros CIENTÍFICOS si tal eclipse solar existió, para Jerusalén o otro lugar?. Si uno de estos genios (que los hay, ¡de veras!) demuestra la historicidad de tal evento cósmico, en ese país, ¿no se cubrirá de la gloria que bañan otros registros arqueológicos? ¡Yo haría mi parte en publicar ese acierto! pues, estoy convencido de muchas cosas que no sé probar, científicamente, al que lee o me escucha.
Estoy revisando la W.W.W para encontrar recursos de investigación. Todos se concentran en el nacimiento y hacen sus comentarios, pero, cuando descubra algo -sobre el eclipse de 3 horas- publicaré la nota. Pienso que más importante es la obra de la cruz (y su historicidad) que Su llegada, bajo los días del censo de Quirinious y cía.
Referencias:
January 14, 0484
"A year before his death there were various omens. There was an eclipse of the Sun which was so pronounced as to turn day into night and the darkness was deep enough for the stars to become visible; it occurred in the eastern horn of the sign of Capricorn. And the almanacs predicted another eclipse that would occur after the first year. They say that such events that are observed to happen in the heavens are indicative of things that happen on the earth; so that these eclipses clearly foretold us of the privation and departure as it were of the light of philosophy." Refers to a total solar eclipse in Athens of 14 January AD 484.
From: Marinus, Greek philosopher, Life of Proclus. Quoted in Historical Eclipses and Earth's Rotation, by F Richard Stephenson, Cambridge University Press, 1997, page 368.
January 14, 0484 Athens
"The eclipse of Sun was so pronounced that it turn day into night and the darkness permitted to see stars..." Marinus Neapolitanus. Life of Proclus, chapter 37 (ref. PG01/00)
January 30, -0280 (0281 BC)
Solar eclipse in Babylon (ref. PG 01/00)
January 31, -0253 (0254 BC)
Solar eclipse in Babylon (ref. PG 01/00)
February 05, -0001 (2 BC)
A Partial Solar Eclipse on Feb. 5 of the year 2 BC in Chang-An, the capital of the Han Dynasty in China, was seen as a good omen for Confucianist Wang Mang, who would soon wrest control of the government from the reigning emperor. Ref. Rudi Thomsen, Ambition and Confucianism, A Biography of Wang Mang. And F.R. Stephenson, Atlas of Historical Eclipse Maps, East Asia 1500 BC to AD 1900. (Ref. ENB10)
February 16, 0538
"The sun darkened on February 16th from dawn until nine in the morning." Refers to a solar eclipse in AD 538. From: The Anglo Saxon Chronicles translated and collated by Anne Savage, CLB Publishing Ltd. Ref FE 01/01
March 04, -0180 (181 BC)
"Year 121 (SE), King An(tiochus), month XII, 29 solar eclipse beginning on the north-west side. In 15 deg day [. . .] over a third of the disk was eclipsed. When it began to become bright, in 15 deg day from north-west to east it became bright. 30 deg total duration. [During this eclipse] east (wind) went. During this eclipse [. . .], Venus, Mercury and Saturn [stood there]. Towards the end of becoming bright, Mars rose (?) The other planets did not stand there. (Began) at 30 deg (= 1) beru after sunrise." Refers to a partial solar eclipse of 14 March 190 BC. Babylon. Babylonian tablet in the British Museum. Quoted in Historical Eclipses and Earth's Rotation, by F Richard Stephenson, Cambridge University Press, 1997, pages 121 and 135.
March 14, -0189 (190 BC)
"Year 121 (SE), King An(tiochus), month XII, 29 solar eclipse beginning on the north-west side. In 15 deg day [. . .] over a third of the disk was eclipsed. When it began to become bright, in 15 deg day from north-west to east it became bright. 30 deg total duration. [During this eclipse] east (wind) went. During this eclipse [. . .], Venus, Mercury and Saturn [stood there]. Towards the end of becoming bright, Mars rose (?) The other planets did not stand there. (Began) at 30 deg (= 1) beru after sunrise." Refers to a partial solar eclipse of 14 March 190 BC. Babylon. Babylonian tablet in the British Museum. Quoted in Historical Eclipses and Earth's Rotation, by F Richard Stephenson, Cambridge University Press, 1997, pages 121 and 135.
March 05, -1222 (1223 BC)
In references the oldest record of a verifiable solar eclipse, on a clay tablet found in the ruins of Ugarit (Syria). This was a total solar eclipse in North Africa and the Middle East. Totality at maximum was 3m55s. Other references say "the sun went down" which also has the expression for "to set".
March 20, 0071
"As there was going to be an eclipse on his birthday, through fear of a disturbance, as there had been other prodigies, he put forth a public notice, not only that the obscuration would take place, and about the time and magnitude of it, but also the causes that produce such an event." Refers to solar eclipse of AD 45, on the birthday of the Roman Emperor, Claudius. From: Dion Cassius. "(Lucies) smiled thereat and said . . . 'Now grant me that nothing that happens to the Sun is so like its setting as a solar eclipse. You will if you call to mind this conjunction recently which, beginning just after noonday, made many stars shine out from many parts of the sky and tempered the air in the manner of twilight. If you do not recall it, Theon here will cite us Minnermus and Cydias, Archilochus and Stesichorus besides, and Pindar, who during eclipses bewail "the brightest star bereft" and at "midday night falling" and say that the beam of the Sun [is sped] the path of shade." "Even if the Moon, however, does sometimes cover the Sun entirely, the eclipse does not have the duration or extension; but a kind of light is visible about the rim which keeps the shadow from being profound and absolute." Both these quotations probably refer to a total solar eclipse of 20 March AD 71. Ref FE 01/01
March 20, 0071(?)
The Greek philosopher and biographer Plutarch gives a vivid account of a total eclipse in one of his dialogues entitles The Face on the Moon. In this same work, he also makes a brief reference to the corona (ref. PG 3/99).
April 03, 0033
"And I will show portents in the sky above, and signs on the earth below - blood and fire and drifting smoke. The Sun shall be turned to darkness, and the moon to blood, before that great, resplendent day, the day of the Lord, shall come." Peter in Acts of the Apostles. This reference to a blood-red Moon, and the following references in the Gospels to a darkening sky, have been interpreted as placing the date of the crucifixion to 24 November AD 29, when there was an eclipse of the Sun, or Friday, 3 April AD 33, when there was a partial eclipse of the Moon over Jerusalem. Ref. FE 01/01.
1rst. E-mail sent:
Good Afternoon!
Allow me to ask you a question. I´ve been trying to find out if there´s any chart or science resourse where I can check a "total sun eclipse" backed to years A.D. 30 , just to understand and know if Jesus´ cross was that truth!.
His historicity can be argued or proved by this predicament!
Would you be pleased to help me, please?
Thanks!
Answer:
>Checked:20 B.C.?
Liu Hsiang first in China to explain that the Moon's motion hides the Sun to cause solar eclipses
150 A.D.?
Ptolemy (Alexandria) demonstrates the computation of solar and lunar eclipses based on their apparent motions rather than the periodic repetition of eclipses
No comments:
Post a Comment